WTF?


by wuffy on Sat 17/Apr/10 11:49am
by pushbikerider on Sat 17/Apr/10 11:59am
Fraser wrote:When are these bikes available, I just get a bit mixed up with the seasons eg it is April 2010 now but in bike land it is 2011.
by dented on Sat 17/Apr/10 12:58pm
by wuffy on Sun 18/Apr/10 4:30pm
"This build belongs to Team KHS rider Logan Binggeli and is one of only two in existence. It weighs in (with the Manitou rear air can) at just over 36 pounds and has a unique BB linkage (that you can read about in a future issue of decline magazine) that, "Feels like a moto," as Logan puts it, "And can pedal through everything."
by Wills27 on Sun 18/Apr/10 5:48pm
wuffy wrote:http://hagoromo.blogspot.com/2010/04/khs-dh-prototype-sea-otter-2010.html
New KHS Dh bike, (Pretty much a mondraker with a different sticker)
"This build belongs to Team KHS rider Logan Binggeli and is one of only two in existence. It weighs in (with the Manitou rear air can) at just over 36 pounds and has a unique BB linkage (that you can read about in a future issue of decline magazine) that, "Feels like a moto," as Logan puts it, "And can pedal through everything."
by wuffy on Sun 18/Apr/10 7:44pm
by jeyboi on Sun 18/Apr/10 8:01pm
fatwombat wrote:wuffy wrote:Jebus... 30 speed?! Why????? .
I don't think they're looking for 30 speeds, mostly people go to 10 at the back so they can cut down to 2 chainrings - e.g. 11-24 or 12-36 at the back, 26/40 on the front - pretty much the same overall range of gears but with less redundancy. Benefits are partly weight (this mainly for the obsessives) but chiefly to give better performance of the drive train.
I must admit I'm tempted - I'd happily lose my top ratios to get a bigger granny and smoother simpler shifting (e.g.12-36 with 24/38).
by wuffy on Sun 18/Apr/10 8:40pm
jeyboi wrote:fatwombat wrote:wuffy wrote:Jebus... 30 speed?! Why????? .
I don't think they're looking for 30 speeds, mostly people go to 10 at the back so they can cut down to 2 chainrings - e.g. 11-24 or 12-36 at the back, 26/40 on the front - pretty much the same overall range of gears but with less redundancy. Benefits are partly weight (this mainly for the obsessives) but chiefly to give better performance of the drive train.
I must admit I'm tempted - I'd happily lose my top ratios to get a bigger granny and smoother simpler shifting (e.g.12-36 with 24/38).
Smoother shifting? Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but 10sp doesn't shift any smoother than 9sp. I'm not sure of the numbers, but isn't a granny of 24:36 an almost identical gear to 22:34?
by wuffy on Sun 18/Apr/10 10:23pm
by Astoria Paranoia on Sun 18/Apr/10 10:30pm
by wuffy on Sun 18/Apr/10 10:44pm
by dented on Sun 18/Apr/10 10:47pm
by Astoria Paranoia on Sun 18/Apr/10 10:48pm
wuffy wrote:If you've got the grips with the lockring on the outside wouldn't it auto-extend or something when you're ridingor has it got some sort of lock.
dented wrote:2 different length end-plugs, and you screw them in until they're tight
by wuffy on Sun 18/Apr/10 10:54pm
Astoria Paranoia wrote:dented wrote:2 different length end-plugs, and you screw them in until they're tight
Bet someone would run them not fully tight
278 Users browsing this website: Google [Bot] and 277 guests
|