The Interwebby Video Thread

[DogsBollocks]

http://media.smh.com.au/national/nation ... 47025.html

[shmoodiver]

that was chock full of ghey

[urgerlemo]

Hi.
Prompt please where to download a program to recognize the texts?

thanx.

[AarowNZ]

What the shit.

[shmoodiver]

indeed!!!

[happybaboon]

Awesome, Glen Beck... What a retard

[E Dogg Capizzle]

Dawkins vs. creationist.

The irony in some of what this lady is saying is incredible: arguing that Dawkins is close minded, all the while he is patiently listening to her babbling.

[happybaboon]

Funny

[thorg]

damn slow streaming at work

cant watch it

but the screen cap you see right here without pushing play scares me It's like she is slightly crosseyed and wants to eat small furry animals or something.

[crazychris]

she's a little light on rality that one. She would however make a damn fine politician as she avoids and redirects questions really well.

[E Dogg Capizzle]

She's horrible. Especially the way (like lots of other religious freaks) she over-enunciates words for God, in this case creat-ooooor.

[happybaboon]

Her blank stare and unnaturally white teeth creep me the hell out.

[happybaboon]

She accuses the Darwinists of being the ones with hidden agendas in this clip

[Whoops]

"Evolutionists bare the burden of proof"

You stupid cow.

[happybaboon]

No, that's fair enough. Sciencenticians are obliged to provide evidence in support of their theories... But biologists have done this exhaustively. There's very excellent evidence in support of Darwinism all over the place - you could see it on a daily basis if you were looking for it. The biologists have more than met the burden of proof for Darwin's theory to be generally accepted by reasonable people, it's just that morons like her choose to refuse to aknowledge that proof.