| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Oli
Mangled
Joined: Aug 03, 2005
Posts: 32,945
|
 Posted: Mon 27/Oct/08 11:13pm Post subject: |
  |
|
Why didn't I get the Bottleguy link? 
P.S. Nice to see a first-time voter with some ability to discern what is what when it comes to choosing your candidates. 
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
happybaboon
Mangled
Joined: Feb 06, 2002
Posts: 28,784
Location: doing skiddds
|
| Posted: Mon 27/Oct/08 11:16pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oli wrote: | | Why didn't I get the Bottleguy link? |
I thought you were the guy in the photos 
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oli
Mangled
Joined: Aug 03, 2005
Posts: 32,945
|
| Posted: Mon 27/Oct/08 11:17pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
happybaboon
Mangled
Joined: Feb 06, 2002
Posts: 28,784
Location: doing skiddds
|
| Posted: Mon 27/Oct/08 11:18pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oli wrote: | | |
Yep. Thats the expression that was on your face!!!! 
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oli
Mangled
Joined: Aug 03, 2005
Posts: 32,945
|
| Posted: Mon 27/Oct/08 11:24pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pm
Dusty
Joined: Jul 26, 2007
Posts: 40
Location: Wellington
|
| Posted: Tue 28/Oct/08 10:50am Post subject: |
|
|
| CookedCray wrote: | I passed Steven Franks on the trails up Mt Vic the other week - Seemed like a pretty good bloke and is supposed to be pretty onto it so I hear.
Is always good to see Trev Mallard out at Poti also giving it a nudge. 
I'm looking forward to it all being over but I reckon it could be one of those results that is close enough that it takes forever to form a government.
The country needs that instability like we need a bottle up the esra imho |
yeah, i was having a quick look at the wgtn central candidates the other day cause i haven't a clue who any of them are. noticed stephen franks had a photo of himself doing karapoti 2008 in his blurb. looked him up in the results and think it was 3 hours 48 mins - not bad for 50+ age group! Trevor mallard did 4:32 so its the national party for the win by 44 minutes!
great that in the wellington region we have candidates from both major parties who are clearly seriously involved in mtb so you can genuinely trust that they will represent us well - talk is cheap, these guys both ride the trail.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kazmeistyr
Flogged
Joined: Sep 14, 2003
Posts: 2,540
Location: BrisVegas
|
| Posted: Tue 28/Oct/08 11:10am Post subject: |
|
|
| pm wrote: | | CookedCray wrote: | I passed Steven Franks on the trails up Mt Vic the other week - Seemed like a pretty good bloke and is supposed to be pretty onto it so I hear.
Is always good to see Trev Mallard out at Poti also giving it a nudge.
I'm looking forward to it all being over but I reckon it could be one of those results that is close enough that it takes forever to form a government.
The country needs that instability like we need a bottle up the esra imho |
yeah, i was having a quick look at the wgtn central candidates the other day cause i haven't a clue who any of them are. noticed stephen franks had a photo of himself doing karapoti 2008 in his blurb. looked him up in the results and think it was 3 hours 48 mins - not bad for 50+ age group! Trevor mallard did 4:32 so its the national party for the win by 44 minutes!
great that in the wellington region we have candidates from both major parties who are clearly seriously involved in mtb so you can genuinely trust that they will represent us well - talk is cheap, these guys both ride the trail. |
But, do they fall into the category of obsessive, deluded, twisted, forum- dwelling lunatics?
Well, they probably do, but not in the sense that the likes of Vorbers are.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
porscha
Dusty
Joined: May 25, 2008
Posts: 32
Location: Queenstown
|
| Posted: Tue 28/Oct/08 11:27am Post subject: |
|
|
Lets look at the facts
1 All CAN people are in central Govt
2 They do not represent us real cyclists
3 They are all linked to the Green party (Hence hidden agendas)
4 They are not a voice for cyclists
5 How many CAN people have you seen competing at at your local Club, do they talk with Clubs - No
6 All they are doing here is tring to create interest in the Green smoke dopping Pro destroy N.Z
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cauld
God Botherer Botherer
Joined: Jan 30, 2006
Posts: 2,041
Location: Wellywood
|
| Posted: Tue 28/Oct/08 11:36am Post subject: |
|
|
| porscha wrote: | Lets look at the facts
1 All CAN people are in central Govt
2 They do not represent us real cyclists
3 They are all linked to the Green party (Hence hidden agendas)
4 They are not a voice for cyclists
5 How many CAN people have you seen competing at at your local Club, do they talk with Clubs - No
6 All they are doing here is tring to create interest in the Green smoke dopping Pro destroy N.Z |
While I'm not in the know enough to comment on the validity of the above, I think that CAN really should have stuck to their knitting editorialised the findings of their political research. let us make up our own minds please.
They've certainly 'threatened' any support they might get from me in the future.
:-(
Last edited by cauld on Tue 28/Oct/08 12:33pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
michael
Flogged
Joined: May 22, 2002
Posts: 3,327
Location: Christchurch
|
| Posted: Tue 28/Oct/08 12:03pm Post subject: |
|
|
| porscha wrote: |
3 They are all linked to the Green party (Hence hidden agendas)
|
You mean your paranoid?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sidlomavpa
Shiny
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Posts: 23
Location: Wellington
|
| Posted: Tue 28/Oct/08 1:22pm Post subject: |
|
|
| porscha wrote: | | Lets look at the facts |
Classic!
A phrase most used by those about to completely ignore/manufacture the "facts"
1= The closest thing, in structure, to a fact from your list (though it's veracity is questionable)
2= Opinion
3= Paranoia
4= Opinion
5= A question
6= Paranoia
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pm
Dusty
Joined: Jul 26, 2007
Posts: 40
Location: Wellington
|
| Posted: Tue 28/Oct/08 1:29pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kazmeistyr wrote: | But, do they fall into the category of obsessive, deluded, twisted, forum- dwelling lunatics?
Well, they probably do, but not in the sense that the likes of Vorbers are. |
yes, but its a sort of private forum with some weird entry restrictions - any random can't just jump in like vorb - its called "parliament". otherwise it seems much the same - often senseless arguments about irrelevant things producing no useful outcome, it just seems to be lacking the entertainment value.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheRealHotKarl
Thrashed
Joined: Feb 10, 2008
Posts: 1,529
|
| Posted: Tue 28/Oct/08 2:29pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oli wrote: | Why didn't I get the Bottleguy link?
P.S. Nice to see a first-time voter with some ability to discern what is what when it comes to choosing your candidates. |
You were lucky on that one 
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
andrecymba
Shiny
Joined: Sep 09, 2007
Posts: 16
|
| Posted: Tue 28/Oct/08 4:33pm Post subject: Central Government Policies |
|
|
| Kazmeistyr wrote: | "Threatens".
Am I incorrect in assuming ( yes, yes I know), that the Central Govt. policies are more to do with access to National Parks etc?
I'm a bit woolly on these. Can anyone shed more light? |
You are right in that local councils play an important role in providing cycling infrastructure.
But the money to implement those is coming (on average - varies form council to council) 50 % from Central Government. The other 50 % is from local rate payers.
The 50 % contribution from local rate payers hardly get into cycling infrastructure - most councils are reluctant to invest more in cycling, either because they see cycling as a minority issue, or just because the typical council is often composed by councillors who are used car dealers, property developers, real state agents, suburbia residents, et cetera. These profiles probably represent fairly well the local communities, but the tradeoff is that you see more roads being built for more suburbian residents buying more used cars, commuting more to and from more greenfield developments, rather than serious provision for cycling.
One of the major shifts that is needed in Central Government policy is to pay for cycling projects with tax payers moneys. This is one of the good proposals that are advocated by the Greens, with its recently released Transport Policy, in which cycling, walking and public transport projects are funded 100 % by Central Government.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ants06
Thrashed
Joined: Sep 13, 2006
Posts: 1,480
|
| Posted: Tue 28/Oct/08 4:46pm Post subject: |
|
|
| michael wrote: | | porscha wrote: |
3 They are all linked to the Green party (Hence hidden agendas)
|
You mean your paranoid? |
NO i think porscha means hidden agendas!
Prob is they ALL have hidden adgendas and were f%^ked no matter how we vote 
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
