Those of you who have them...what do you reckon? are they more freeride than AM ...    to heavy for epic rides?... :eh: ...A ... 
"i‘m not your friend, i‘m a stone cold traitor." Rules | Bookmark | Help | Advertise | Contact | About |
 
Mini VorbForumsBuy + SellEventsRidesVideoPhotosDirectoryWinRegister/Logon
Forum Tools/Search
VORB IS IN MAINTENANCE MODE
You will not be able logon or make posts. We recommend you ride your bike in the meantime.

[CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION]

Reign X1, To Heavy For Am/single Track???yes/no


Goto page <<  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  >>
 
[Register/Logon]
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Homepage -> Forum Index -> Mountain Biking -> Reign X1, To Heavy For Am/single Track???yes/no
View previous topic :: View next topic  

To heavy for AM/singletrack epics
Yes
18%
 18%  [ 9 ]
No
81%
 81%  [ 39 ]
Total Votes : 48

Author Message
phunk
Mangled
Mangled


Joined: Feb 28, 2004
Posts: 12,308

PostPosted: Sat 19/Jul/08 6:26pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

{Posted via mobile.vorb.org.nz} Im with Nick, too much bike for epics. Depends on your definition of epic though.

But for 6 hour jungle missions I would want something lighter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Butch
Wrecked
Wrecked


Joined: Sep 02, 2006
Posts: 7,669
Location: Clearing out the SPCA

PostPosted: Sat 19/Jul/08 6:32pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

^ whippets...

Tongue it
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
phunk
Mangled
Mangled


Joined: Feb 28, 2004
Posts: 12,308

PostPosted: Sat 19/Jul/08 6:36pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

{Posted via mobile.vorb.org.nz} Just cos you need an excuse for being so slow..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Butch
Wrecked
Wrecked


Joined: Sep 02, 2006
Posts: 7,669
Location: Clearing out the SPCA

PostPosted: Sat 19/Jul/08 6:37pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

I'm not going to dispute that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
phunk
Mangled
Mangled


Joined: Feb 28, 2004
Posts: 12,308

PostPosted: Sat 19/Jul/08 6:38pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

{Posted via mobile.vorb.org.nz} NO, YOU ARE!!!11!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Butch
Wrecked
Wrecked


Joined: Sep 02, 2006
Posts: 7,669
Location: Clearing out the SPCA

PostPosted: Sat 19/Jul/08 6:39pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

Calm down, you're starting to resonate. Crazy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
phunk
Mangled
Mangled


Joined: Feb 28, 2004
Posts: 12,308

PostPosted: Sat 19/Jul/08 6:43pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

{Posted via mobile.vorb.org.nz} Its the wanton seat tube Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
danose
Mangled
Mangled


Joined: May 27, 2004
Posts: 10,986
Location: Nose City

PostPosted: Sat 19/Jul/08 6:44pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

Nick_K wrote:

*Disclaimer. I'm a xc jeyboi and think 25pounds is getting heavy.


see that's where we differ - I do most of my training on the big/heavy bike - means when I just back on the 23lb hardtail it's like it rides itself up the hills.

wheras if you ride all the time on the light bike you'll never get mad strong and have quads the size of slackboys!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Tee
Worn
Worn


Joined: Jul 07, 2004
Posts: 524
Location: Te Henga, Westside

PostPosted: Sat 19/Jul/08 6:47pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

Its my only bike and I find it a great do-it-all.
I could ride it all day, currently set up 1x9, 36ish pounds (Im a cycle Postie though....)

Lighter tyres and clipless pedals for the XC type stuff, a shade under 34 pounds (eg: the Moonride), and flats and knobblies for everything else,

$2600 is a great deal on the X. Id go for it, but it all comes down to how and what you are most likely to be riding.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mitch7
Thrashed
Thrashed


Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Posts: 1,819
Location: dodging bullets

PostPosted: Sat 19/Jul/08 8:54pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

I've never got to the top first...you could chuck me on some XC carbon thingy and most half decent riders on LT bikes would beat me.I don't do XC.

I plod up hill...but love the Downs...fast, tech,rocky,rooty,bush,twisty...singletrack....thats what I love.

16kg(whats that in lbs??) is getting up there but some bikes hide their weight(or so I've heard)..and the lighter wheelset is an option.

also I'm on a budget...Mortgage has my nuts in a jar. Paranoid
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
slowMTB
Worn
Worn


Joined: Mar 22, 2008
Posts: 640
Location: Crashing on a perfectly groomed trail near you .ChCh

PostPosted: Sat 19/Jul/08 10:08pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

16kg = 35.27 lbs

Sounds like from your above statement that it would be spot on. I am like you and will plod all day looking forward to that intense techy blast back down the hill. Why is it every time you go into a bike shop they start talking "race" and "how fast this and that will make you" - hell I did that shiat years ago, now I just wanta ride Wink

Anyway, good luck with it Double Thumbs Up

And you are correct - some bikes do hide their weight. My Speccy Epic weighs 11.8kg ( 26lbs ) complete and climbs unbelievably - someone on this forum called it heavy Roll Eyes - yeah what ever - weight weenies Paranoid . Dont get too hung up on the weight thing - seriously
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
danose
Mangled
Mangled


Joined: May 27, 2004
Posts: 10,986
Location: Nose City

PostPosted: Sun 20/Jul/08 8:51am    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

slowMTB wrote:
And you are correct - some bikes do hide their weight. My Speccy Epic weighs 11.8kg ( 26lbs ) complete and climbs unbelievably - someone on this forum called it heavy Roll Eyes - yeah what ever - weight weenies Paranoid . Dont get too hung up on the weight thing - seriously


no point having a light bike if you don't have the legs/lungs to go with it - I've ripped people on whippet bike's legs off on the 'heavy' reign (33lb) - the combo of fitness (and a willingness to suffer) plus lots of travel meaning you can be very slack on line choice uphill as well as down is good Double Thumbs Up
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
pushbikerider
Mangled
Mangled


Joined: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 14,247
Location: No longer Running PNC Like John Gotti

PostPosted: Sun 20/Jul/08 9:22am    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

mitch7 wrote:
I've never got to the top first...you could chuck me on some XC carbon thingy and most half decent riders on LT bikes would beat me.I don't do XC.

I plod up hill...but love the Downs...fast, tech,rocky,rooty,bush,twisty...singletrack....thats what I love.

16kg(whats that in lbs??) is getting up there but some bikes hide their weight(or so I've heard)..and the lighter wheelset is an option.


As some one who is in a similar place riding wise to you, ie I'm not that fast up the hill, no matter what I ride (I know I need to do some work) but love techy descents, I would buy the rein, it sounds like a great little bike, but get some weight off the wheels (sensibly, you still want tyres that give you lots of grip, and reliable rims)

I'm currently riding a Turner RFX/SPot hybrid and am happy to ride all day in the hills on it and I enjoy the downs, but I can do big climbs on it (it just takes a wee while) currently it weighs 35 pounds approx, but that is with big rubber and hope mono 6 Ti's, and with lghter tyres I have ridden 24solo moonride on this bike

The other $$ I would spent would be on a Gravity Dropper / Joplin / Q Shifter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
more_horse_link
Worn
Worn


Joined: Jun 14, 2007
Posts: 926
Location: Avoiding pies

PostPosted: Sun 20/Jul/08 10:30am    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

I know you want a dually but for that budget you could build up a really sweet steel framed AM hardtail!

Of course you would need to buy the parts off shore. My Cove for example came in shy of $2600 with a splash of King, Thomson and other bits.

A budget of $2600 buys a hell of a bike these days as long as you are happy to do some research and put in some effort.

Just a thought Smile



ooooh4.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  29.63 KB
 Viewed:  492 Time(s)

ooooh4.jpg


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Robbie
stonemason
stonemason


Joined: Sep 07, 2004
Posts: 11,300
Location: Wellington

PostPosted: Sun 20/Jul/08 12:08pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

danose wrote:
no point having a light bike if you don't have the legs/lungs to go with it


Totally not true. Why on earth should somebody have to have a certain level of fitness to justify lighter tires, for example?

As a heavy slow rider with a 29lb and a sub 24 lb bike and two things are obvious:
1. A light bike is much more fun to ride, especially if the weight is saved in tires and/or rims. More agile, more zippy etc.
2. climbing is a little faster.

Thers is no doubt the fitness of the rider is by far the largest determining factor in grinding up an incline, but there is far more to mountainbiking than that. Double Thumbs Up
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Homepage -> Forum Index -> Mountain Biking -> Reign X1, To Heavy For Am/single Track???yes/no All times are GMT + 12 Hours
Goto page <<  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  >>
Page 2 of 5

 

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

RSS Feed: http://www.vorb.org.nz/rss-2-20.xml

Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops © 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

  • SRAM
  • Wide Open
  • 2Stage Bikes
  • Active Kiwi
  • Bike Barn
  • Bike HQ
  • Burkes Cycles
  • Cactus Climbing
  • Cycle Xpress
  • Ezi Grip
  • Grind Bikes
  • Ground Effect
  • GT Bicycles
  • Kore
  • Nzo Active
  • O2 Project
  • Puresports
  • Revolution Products
  • Ride Cycles
  • Spoke Magazine
 
There isn't content right now for this block.
[Popular Threads]
People Online: 75
 
Contact Advertising About Vorb Statistics Support Vorb
 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest ℗ 2000-2008 by Tama Easton. Extra design ℗ by Scotty Lane and Nathan Whitley. Photos and written work on this site are property of their owners, do not use them for commercial purposes.
Developed for Microsoft Internet Explorer 7.0 and Mozilla Firefox 3.0

Web site engine code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation 1.037 Seconds (PHP: 29% | SQL: 71%) - 57 Queries