Joined: Feb 06, 2002 Posts: 28,260 Location: doing skiddds
Posted: Tue 15th Jan 1:13pm Post subject:
Bigfoot wrote:
Drive more, drive up the price, use up the oil - force science to get on it.
Wouldn't it make more sense for an environmentally and socially conscious military hardman of some description to blockage a large amount of oil, thus artificially reducing supply in the short term and driving up the price?
Drive more, drive up the price, use up the oil - force science to get on it.
Wouldn't it make more sense for an environmentally and socially conscious military hardman of some description to blockage a large amount of oil, thus artificially reducing supply in the short term and driving up the price?
Joined: Feb 06, 2002 Posts: 28,260 Location: doing skiddds
Posted: Tue 15th Jan 1:25pm Post subject:
j2hyde wrote:
happybaboon wrote:
Bigfoot wrote:
Drive more, drive up the price, use up the oil - force science to get on it.
Wouldn't it make more sense for an environmentally and socially conscious military hardman of some description to blockage a large amount of oil, thus artificially reducing supply in the short term and driving up the price?
I think that that would make sense.
Have you been smoking the same crack as philstar?
Crack...? He told me it was ancient Hindu intelligence salts!
Drive more, drive up the price, use up the oil - force science to get on it.
Wouldn't it make more sense for an environmentally and socially conscious military hardman of some description to blockage a large amount of oil, thus artificially reducing supply in the short term and driving up the price?
I think that that would make sense.
Iran has a vast amount of oil.
Bush has less than a year left to go out in a blaze of glory.
Drive more, drive up the price, use up the oil - force science to get on it.
Wouldn't it make more sense for an environmentally and socially conscious military hardman of some description to blockage a large amount of oil, thus artificially reducing supply in the short term and driving up the price?
I think that that would make sense.
Iran has a vast amount of oil.
Bush has less than a year left to go out in a blaze of glory.
But Bush is doing what he swore he'd never do. Spending his lame duck years trying to be a middle east peacemaker (al la Bill Clinton). Naturally the locals are a bit cynical about it - and rightly so, not only is Bush a war mongering tosser - he's never suceeded at anything in his life.
Joined: Aug 02, 2005 Posts: 996 Location: In your garden
Posted: Mon 21st Jan 8:49pm Post subject:
phunk wrote:
BrokenKonaRider wrote:
And oil isn't/doesn't?
Not compared to the alternatives.
So certain! I'd be very interested in an impartial, unbiased view of the social and environmental costs associated with using fossil or biofuel blend transport fuels.
An unbiased view would probably record a lowering of happiness of tequila drinkers, but a economic gain for the mexican farmers from this story:
Joined: Mar 20, 2007 Posts: 3,257 Location: Invercargill
Posted: Mon 21st Jan 8:53pm Post subject:
I dont know if this would work or not but couldnt road crews start using concrete for building new roads to save all the oil that is currentally used in that sector?
All times are GMT + 12 Hours Goto page <<1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 12, 13, 14>>
Page 9 of 14
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest ℗ 2000-2008 by Tama Easton.
Extra design ℗ by Scotty Lane and Nathan Whitley. Photos and written work on this site are property of their owners, do not use them for commercial purposes.
Developed for Microsoft Internet Explorer 7.0 and Mozilla Firefox 3.0
The mind boggles.
