| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
j2hyde
Flogged
Joined: Sep 23, 2005
Posts: 3,538
|
 Posted: Mon 19/Nov/07 7:23pm Post subject: |
  |
|
| BrokenKonaRider wrote: | | j2hyde wrote: | | The anthropogenic global warming theory pushed by IPCC does not fit observational or experimental evidence. |
Can't you read? Look at #4 above. |
Same old same old: Clear as mud. You should have just posted a link to the Al Gore fanclub.
Can't you read? There's a nice little PDF attached above - though the big words and formula may be beyond your education the message is pretty simple.
Also: 
| The source BKR provided wrote: |
"It is my understanding from the IPCC researchers that only 55 scientists actually signed the IPCC study - the remaining 1,945 didn't even get to see it before it was published and a large percentage have voiced their disagreement with its findings. This excludes the 19,000 scientists who signed the Oregon Peititon saying this matter is bogus." |
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave_the_Slushy
Thrashed
Joined: Nov 10, 2006
Posts: 1,932
Location: Rocking into Mordor on me mighty steed...his name is Fluffy
|
| Posted: Mon 19/Nov/07 9:23pm Post subject: |
|
|
Global warming is real, mother nature hates us and we're all going to die. Unless we all agree upon a solution.
And that solution is nuclear winter.
I propose that we nuke Switzerland with everything we've got (kcufers have it coming), and then we'll be sweet.
End of line.
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BrokenKonaRider
Worn
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
Posts: 996
Location: In your garden
|
| Posted: Tue 20/Nov/07 9:28am Post subject: |
|
|
| j2hyde wrote: | Same old same old: Clear as mud. You should have just posted a link to the Al Gore fanclub.
Can't you read? There's a nice little PDF attached above - though the big words and formula may be beyond your education the message is pretty simple. |
It's a 10 year old unpublished paper by a museum geologist that has been thoroughly dismissed. I know the paper, and it's a waste of anyone's energy reading it.
| j2hyde wrote: | Also:
| The source BKR provided wrote: |
"It is my understanding from the IPCC researchers that only 55 scientists actually signed the IPCC study - the remaining 1,945 didn't even get to see it before it was published and a large percentage have voiced their disagreement with its findings. This excludes the 19,000 scientists who signed the Oregon Peititon saying this matter is bogus." |
|
Meh, you're just sledging now. You know that Oregon petition has zero credibility:
"This grouping of fields concealed the fact that only a few dozen, at most, of the signatories were drawn from the core disciplines of climate science - such as meteorology, oceanography, and glaciology - and almost none were climate specialists"
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Oregon_Institute_of_Scienceblahblahblah
Getting any number of people to agree on the exact text of a huge volume of information, such as the IPCC reports, is arduous, if not impossible. Hence the IPCC approach of lead authors and reviewers, followed by subscription by govts. Disagreements on the text can be from any angle, including the final text not being strong enough, or already out of date.
When are you going to stop making a fool of yourself?
|
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
82.91 KB |
| Viewed: |
386 Time(s) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dave_the_Slushy
Thrashed
Joined: Nov 10, 2006
Posts: 1,932
Location: Rocking into Mordor on me mighty steed...his name is Fluffy
|
| Posted: Tue 20/Nov/07 4:54pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BrokenKonaRider wrote: | | It's a 10 year old unpublished paper by a museum geologist that has been thoroughly dismissed. I know the paper, and it's a waste of anyone's energy reading it. |
Hurhur! No Peer Review! Scholowned.
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CrustyMTB
Wrecked
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: 4,587
Location: Back in the Hood
|
| Posted: Tue 20/Nov/07 5:14pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Is global warming scepticism the new santa cruz/intense/transition/ ownership? When will the cool kids get into fundamentalist religion?
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Halo24
Worn
Joined: Aug 20, 2007
Posts: 774
Location: Chill Trollin'
|
| Posted: Tue 20/Nov/07 5:26pm Post subject: |
|
|
Personally, I don't think a pattern over a few years is enough to come to any conclusion or accurate prediction.
However, I agree with some of the things which the global warming proponents are suggesting regarding reducing pollution, fossil fuel reliance etc, however like most political groups their message gets drowned in all the fear, uncertainty, and doubt.
You've got to make it cool to be eco friendly, not shout at people and then shout even louder when they ignore you and turn away.
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
