The Cycling Advocates Network (CAN) says fuel price hikes are inevitable over the foreseeable future, so motorists need to g ... 
"i want to give you everything. i want to give you energy. i want to give a good thing." Rules | Bookmark | Help | Advertise | Contact | About |
 
Mini VorbForumsBuy + SellEventsRidesVideoPhotosDirectoryWinRegister/Logon
Forum Tools/Search

Cycling Advocates Say ' Get Used To Petrol Price Hikes '


Goto page <<  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  >>
 
[Register/Logon]
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Homepage -> Forum Index -> Everyday Biking -> Cycling Advocates Say ' Get Used To Petrol Price Hikes '
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Fango
Ridden
Ridden


Joined: Jun 28, 2004
Posts: 218
Location: Wellers

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 9:46am    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

Joel wrote:
CAN basically put themselves in the "fringe no one listens too crazy freaks with beards cycle touring hippy" pile with this press release.

all it does is alienate, so not sure what an earth they are trying to achieve. where is the marketing person for them.. surely they lurk on vorb.. perhaps they can clarify who an earth they are trying to influence...


But of course deep down, you know they are right - the cost of petrol and diesel will continue to rise and we ultimately have no choice but to change our attitudes and lifestyles eventually - some of us did it ages ago, some more recently and others stay in denial blaming all sorts of things - conveniently the gummint, but we do have to change or else maybe go to war to try to preserve our access to the stuff - or grow biofuels at the expense of others' food resources... It's like Ghandi said - first they laugh at you, then they abuse you, then you win.

Go CAN!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swtchbckr
Scuffed
Scuffed


Joined: Mar 22, 2005
Posts: 495
Location: Chacha

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 9:51am    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

YEP. we've reached peak oil. the prices will fluctuate for a few years, but will always go up up up. CAN are totally right, and you little weeners who are dissing them are totally wrong. get your heads out of your asses and open your eyes. get used to it.

oh, and if you dont like what CAN are saying, dont read it, and dont comment on it. ignore it and it'll go away. NOT
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
phunk
Mangled
Mangled


Joined: Feb 28, 2004
Posts: 11,778

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 9:57am    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

{Posted via mobile.vorb.org.nz} So if the cost of petrol and diesel is going to rise, why the extra taxes?

I am dissing the delivery of the message, but nice that you expose your bias in that way. kcidpunk.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Joel
Wrecked
Wrecked


Joined: Mar 26, 2002
Posts: 5,285
Location: Welly

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 10:08am    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

phunk wrote:
{Posted via mobile.vorb.org.nz} So if the cost of petrol and diesel is going to rise, why the extra taxes?

I am dissing the delivery of the message, but nice that you expose your bias in that way. kcidpunk.


I'm With Stupid
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
philstar
Thrashed
Thrashed


Joined: Mar 05, 2006
Posts: 1,525
Location: Auckland, Mt eden

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 10:24am    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

phunk wrote:
{Posted via mobile.vorb.org.nz} So if the cost of petrol and diesel is going to rise, why the extra taxes?

I am dissing the delivery of the message, but nice that you expose your bias in that way. kcidpunk.


I would have thought you would be in favour of voluntary/optional taxes Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phunk
Mangled
Mangled


Joined: Feb 28, 2004
Posts: 11,778

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 10:26am    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

{Posted via mobile.vorb.org.nz} A voluntary tax?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Bigfoot
Mangled
Mangled


Joined: Jul 13, 2003
Posts: 23,767
Location: The distant future - the year 2000. (Canada)

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 10:26am    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

Laugh Out Loud
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
thorg
Gozzies: the new black
Gozzies: the new black


Joined: May 20, 2004
Posts: 12,707
Location: Looking for gozzies - have you seen any?

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 10:28am    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

{Posted via mobile.vorb.org.nz} when goods are made using these fuels, and transported using theses fuels - how is the tax optional unless you dont buy anything Sly

no - its just CAN jumping on top of a very high moral point, and then slipping and getting that point rammed right up their collective. . . Huh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
neels
Slightly below average
Slightly below average


Joined: Sep 05, 2007
Posts: 854
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 10:31am    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

They're right that the price of oil is going to keep going up, but the tax approach is a bit short sighted I would have thought.

If you add further cost to fuel, you also add that cost to everything, so you punish everybody including cyclists.

I would have thought that the other idea that is doing the rounds at the moment of direct charging for road usage would be more effectively targeted.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
musket
Mangled
Mangled


Joined: Sep 28, 2002
Posts: 8,292
Location: Transient

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 12:32pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

neels wrote:
They're right that the price of oil is going to keep going up, but the tax approach is a bit short sighted I would have thought.

If you add further cost to fuel, you also add that cost to everything, so you punish everybody including cyclists.

I would have thought that the other idea that is doing the rounds at the moment of direct charging for road usage would be more effectively targeted.


That argument doesn't hold either - alcohol,fuel and cigarettes are taxed to deter their consumption. Doesn't mean that bread and milk should be taxed more heavily.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
neels
Slightly below average
Slightly below average


Joined: Sep 05, 2007
Posts: 854
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 12:47pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

If you charge more for the fuel for the tractors, factory machinery & transport vehicles, that will get passed on in the cost of the final product. So everybody pays. If you tax individual road usage, only the actual user pays.

As for alcohol & cigarettes, I'm pretty sure neither of them are used in making bread and milk., I would have thought they would be classified as non-essential products so you choose to pay the tax if you choose to buy them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thorg
Gozzies: the new black
Gozzies: the new black


Joined: May 20, 2004
Posts: 12,707
Location: Looking for gozzies - have you seen any?

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 12:58pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

{Posted via mobile.vorb.org.nz} alcohol - nonessential Eh?

repent heathen Hmmmm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
neels
Slightly below average
Slightly below average


Joined: Sep 05, 2007
Posts: 854
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 1:02pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

thorg wrote:
{Posted via mobile.vorb.org.nz} alcohol - nonessential Eh?

repent heathen Hmmmm


You can live without it.

The question is why would you want to Smile

Oh, and pass me another beer thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
musket
Mangled
Mangled


Joined: Sep 28, 2002
Posts: 8,292
Location: Transient

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 1:06pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

neels wrote:
If you charge more for the fuel for the tractors, factory machinery & transport vehicles, that will get passed on in the cost of the final product. So everybody pays. If you tax individual road usage, only the actual user pays.

As for alcohol & cigarettes, I'm pretty sure neither of them are used in making bread and milk., I would have thought they would be classified as non-essential products so you choose to pay the tax if you choose to buy them.


I wonder how much alcohol contributes to the economy?

There are ways dealing with farm / production costs of fuel tax, that don't make it unworkable. I do agree taxing users is a method that can work (look to asia where car rego is huge).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
neels
Slightly below average
Slightly below average


Joined: Sep 05, 2007
Posts: 854
Location: Waiting for the great leap forward

PostPosted: Tue 13th May 1:16pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Abuse

musket wrote:
I do agree taxing users is a method that can work (look to asia where car rego is huge).


But then there's no incentive, you're already paying the registration anyway so why not use the car. And why should I pay more rego on my 4 vehicles when I can only drive one at a time, it's a deterrent from owning them not from using them
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Homepage -> Forum Index -> Everyday Biking -> Cycling Advocates Say ' Get Used To Petrol Price Hikes ' All times are GMT + 12 Hours
Goto page <<  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  >>
Page 2 of 10

 

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

RSS Feed: http://www.vorb.org.nz/rss-14-20.xml

Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops © 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Forums ©

  • Bike HQ
  • Burkes Cycles
  • Cactus Climbing
  • Cycle Xpress
  • Grind Bikes
  • Ground Effect
  • GT Bicycles
  • Hub Cycles
  • Kohosis
  • Nzo Active
  • O2 Project
  • Puresports
  • Revolution Products
  • Ride Cycles
  • Spoke Magazine
  • SRAM
  • Wide Open
  • Bike Barn
 
There isn't content right now for this block.
[Popular Threads]
People Online: 208
 
Contact Advertising About Vorb Statistics Support Vorb
 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest ℗ 2000-2008 by Tama Easton. Extra design ℗ by Scotty Lane and Nathan Whitley. Photos and written work on this site are property of their owners, do not use them for commercial purposes.
Developed for Microsoft Internet Explorer 7.0 and Mozilla Firefox 3.0

Web site engine code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation 0.274 Seconds (PHP: 38% | SQL: 62%) - 51 Queries