E Dogg Capizzle wrote:Does that win the award for most pointless use of physics in a Vorb thread, or what?
Considering it has had a (half-hour) silencing effect.. perhaps it should get the "most useful" award for use of Physics on Vorb?
by MTBChick on Wed 21/Apr/10 9:03pm
E Dogg Capizzle wrote:Does that win the award for most pointless use of physics in a Vorb thread, or what?
by phunk on Wed 21/Apr/10 9:03pm
E Dogg Capizzle wrote:Does that win the award for most pointless use of physics in a Vorb thread, or what?
by disoriented on Wed 21/Apr/10 9:15pm
phunk wrote:E Dogg Capizzle wrote:Does that win the award for most pointless use of physics in a Vorb thread, or what?
Its about as useful as mathematical economic models..
by Wobbler on Wed 21/Apr/10 9:17pm
by E Dogg Capizzle on Wed 21/Apr/10 9:19pm
disoriented wrote:Meh it wouldn't be that far off.

by SlackBoy on Wed 21/Apr/10 9:28pm
Is that roadie speak for I never get close to the limits of my tires grip anyway. The temperature pays a big part in grip, so does the road surface. Seeing as the road on both sides is a fairy high bank, depending on the orientation of the said piece of road, the road might likey have been mossy on the sides. What if upon seeing the cops car in the middle of the road, the rider reacted within .75 of a second, grabbed on the brakes, grabbed too much brake in the panic situation, locked upm had to get back off the brakes a bit to regain control, and then back on thus making the available braking distance much much less. Without knowing any of these factors, and other onsite factors, posting up formulae and postuering that he had to of been doing this or that shows you up for a smuckdisoriented wrote:phunk wrote:E Dogg Capizzle wrote:Does that win the award for most pointless use of physics in a Vorb thread, or what?
Its about as useful as mathematical economic models..
Meh it wouldn't be that far off. Would be easy to factor in the effect of gravity if you used vector diagrams and new the slop of the hill. The really deciding factor is if the bike had got "air" ie the down force on the tires had changed going over the brow as iodi said and would it come back to normal in the reaction time? Being as it was on dry roads I don't think the friction bit would of changed significantly.
by disoriented on Wed 21/Apr/10 9:43pm
SlackBoy wrote:Is that roadie speak for I never get close to the limits of my tires grip anyway. The temperature pays a big part in grip, so does the road surface. Seeing as the road on both sides is a fairy high bank, depending on the orientation of the said piece of road, the road might likey have been mossy on the sides. What if upon seeing the cops car in the middle of the road, the rider reacted within .75 of a second, grabbed on the brakes, grabbed too much brake in the panic situation, locked upm had to get back off the brakes a bit to regain control, and then back on thus making the available braking distance much much less. Without knowing any of these factors, and other onsite factors, posting up formulae and postuering that he had to of been doing this or that shows you up for a smuckdisoriented wrote:phunk wrote:E Dogg Capizzle wrote:Does that win the award for most pointless use of physics in a Vorb thread, or what?
Its about as useful as mathematical economic models..
Meh it wouldn't be that far off. Would be easy to factor in the effect of gravity if you used vector diagrams and new the slop of the hill. The really deciding factor is if the bike had got "air" ie the down force on the tires had changed going over the brow as iodi said and would it come back to normal in the reaction time? Being as it was on dry roads I don't think the friction bit would of changed significantly.
by bubbaa on Wed 21/Apr/10 11:16pm
phunk wrote:E Dogg Capizzle wrote:Does that win the award for most pointless use of physics in a Vorb thread, or what?
Its about as useful as mathematical economic models..

by dicks-naughty-account on Wed 21/Apr/10 11:26pm
disoriented wrote:SlackBoy wrote:Is that roadie speak for I never get close to the limits of my tires grip anyway. The temperature pays a big part in grip, so does the road surface. Seeing as the road on both sides is a fairy high bank, depending on the orientation of the said piece of road, the road might likey have been mossy on the sides. What if upon seeing the cops car in the middle of the road, the rider reacted within .75 of a second, grabbed on the brakes, grabbed too much brake in the panic situation, locked upm had to get back off the brakes a bit to regain control, and then back on thus making the available braking distance much much less. Without knowing any of these factors, and other onsite factors, posting up formulae and postuering that he had to of been doing this or that shows you up for a smuckdisoriented wrote:phunk wrote:E Dogg Capizzle wrote:Does that win the award for most pointless use of physics in a Vorb thread, or what?
Its about as useful as mathematical economic models..
Meh it wouldn't be that far off. Would be easy to factor in the effect of gravity if you used vector diagrams and new the slop of the hill. The really deciding factor is if the bike had got "air" ie the down force on the tires had changed going over the brow as iodi said and would it come back to normal in the reaction time? Being as it was on dry roads I don't think the friction bit would of changed significantly.
Meh all I was out to prove to HDC that there is a huge difference between a rider travelling at 100 and 150 kph. Flame me all you want end of the day it is going to change much.
by Astoria Paranoia on Wed 21/Apr/10 11:35pm
57 Users browsing this website: Barbsarama, chuckie34, Exabot [Bot], fugspit, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], gristle, MSNbot Media, nagem, psbot [Picsearch], ryda, SamKnight, sturdy, wachtourak, waspman, Wobbler and 38 guests
